A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
refers to legislation that arrives from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common regulation,” and “case precedent,” provides a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And exactly how they are applied in certain types of case.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of one day in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained via the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged event as well as prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to become the real brothers of your deceased but they didn't react in any respect towards the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of events that extra judicial confession of an accused is often a weak style of evidence which can be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is additionally relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light within the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at 4.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID expected) to criminal and traffic case information in the general district courts to the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then technique the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided by the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment on the grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any likely adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to be created.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in making use of the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to in the state court, for the same level.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of your Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all performing in their Employment with DCFS.
All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as the Voice Case Information System, that enables callers to get primary case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to make use of and obtainable 24 hrs every day.
Criminal cases Inside the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their personal previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.
In order to prove murder, there must be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – check here and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )